Cold Press vs Masticating Juicer
There is no difference. They are two names for one machine, and knowing that saves you from a confused purchase.
By Brijon M. · Last reviewed October 2, 2026
We earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It does not change what we recommend or the order we rank things in. Full disclosure.
There is no difference. Cold press and masticating describe the same mechanism: a single auger turning slowly, crushing produce against a screen. If a product page uses both terms it is not listing two features. This page exists because the question is asked constantly, and because a confident-sounding fake distinction is exactly how people get sold the wrong machine.
Where the two words come from
- Masticating is the mechanical description. To masticate is to chew, and that is what a tapered auger does: it drags produce forward and progressively crushes it.
- Cold press is marketing language. It borrows from commercial cold-pressed juice, where a hydraulic press squeezes pulp without heat. A home juicer has no hydraulic press -- it has an auger. The phrase stuck because slow crushing generates less friction heat and less aeration than a high-speed basket.
- Slow juicer is the honest plain-English version, and it is the most accurate of the three.
All three refer to the same machines. Omega's NC900HDC is sold as a cold press juicer and is a masticating juicer. Hurom's H400 is sold as a slow juicer and is the same mechanism again.
What to compare instead
Since the terms do not distinguish anything, here is what actually does -- and all of it is published, unlike yield:
| What to compare | Why it matters | Published example |
|---|---|---|
| Vertical or horizontal | Decides counter space, parts count and wheatgrass capability | Omega states 19.22 in width for the horizontal NC900HDC |
| Chute width | The specification you feel every morning | Hurom states 45 mm; Kuvings states 3.5 in plus a 1.75 in auto-cut chute |
| Strainer or strainer-free | The biggest single cleanup variable | Hurom's Easy Clean has no mesh strainer; Cuisinart's CSJ-300 is mesh-free |
| Adjustable back-pressure | The only documented extraction control anyone offers | Omega states five end-cap pressure settings on the NC900HDC |
| Reverse function | Turns a jam from a disassembly into a five-second fix | Nutribullet and AMZCHEF both state one |
| Warranty | A company stating how long it expects its product to last | 15 years from Omega, Hurom and Kuvings; 1 year from Ninja and Nutribullet |
| Speed in RPM | Useful context, not a performance ranking | 43 RPM (Omega VSJ843) to 110 RPM (Tribest twin gear) |
| Criterion | Omega NC900HDC | Hurom H400 Easy Clean | Kuvings REVO830 | Nutribullet Slow Juicer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | Omega markets high juice yield and five pressure settings; no numeric yield figure is publishedManufacturer claim: Omega Juicers · checked 2026-10-02 | Hurom claims the highest yield and least pulp of any Easy Clean model; no numeric figure, and no independent verification we could findManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02 | Not availableNot sourced | Not availableNot sourced |
| Pulp | Five adjustable pressure settings and two juicing screens, per OmegaManufacturer claim: Omega Juicers · checked 2026-10-02 | Hurom claims the least pulp of any Easy Clean model; no comparable figure publishedManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02 | Not availableNot sourced | Not availableNot sourced |
| Cleanup time | Not available - no published cleanup time in minutesNot sourced | Hurom markets it as Scrub-Free Cleaning; no cleanup time in minutes is publishedManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02 | Not available - no published cleanup time in minutesNot sourced | Not available - no published cleanup time in minutesNot sourced |
| Price | $200–400Band from retailer listings, checked 2026-10-02 | $400+Band from retailer listings, checked 2026-10-02 | $400+Band from retailer listings, checked 2026-10-02 | $100–200Band from retailer listings, checked 2026-10-02 |
| Noise | Not available | Not available | Kuvings describes the motor as noise-reduction; no decibel figure publishedManufacturer claim: Kuvings USA · checked 2026-10-02 | Not available |
| Speed | Omega states 80 RPM and 150 W outputManufacturer claim: Omega Juicers · checked 2026-10-02 | Hurom states 90 RPM, 150 WManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02 | Kuvings states 50 RPM, 240 WManufacturer claim: Kuvings USA · checked 2026-10-02 | Nutribullet states 65 RPM, 150 W, with a reverse functionManufacturer claim: Nutribullet · checked 2026-10-02 |
| Warranty | Omega states a 15-year limited warrantyManufacturer claim: Omega Juicers · checked 2026-10-02 | Hurom states a 15-year warranty on motor and partsManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02 | Kuvings USA states a 15-year limited warranty (regional sellers list shorter terms)Manufacturer claim: Kuvings USA · checked 2026-10-02 | Nutribullet states a 1-year limited warrantyManufacturer claim: Nutribullet · checked 2026-10-02 |
The distinction that does exist
Within the cold press category there is one genuine mechanical division, and it is not cold press versus masticating. It is single auger versus twin gear. A twin gear machine has no auger at all: two interlocking gears crush produce between them. Tribest states 110 RPM for the Greenstar series.
That is a real difference in mechanism, extraction and cleanup, and it is the comparison worth reading if you are looking for one. Twin gear vs masticating covers it.

So what should you buy?
Start from shape and cleanup rather than terminology. Vertical for most kitchens; horizontal if you want wheatgrass or adjustable extraction. Strainer-free if cleanup is what would stop you. Best masticating juicers ranks the field, and the cold press hub orients you in the category.
What to do when a listing only says cold press
A practical problem, because plenty of retail listings use the marketing term and nothing else. If all you have is "cold press", the information you actually need is still usually on the page, under different names. Look for these four, in this order:
- 1.A speed in RPM. Anything from roughly 40 to 110 is a single-auger cold press machine. Anything in the thousands is centrifugal being mislabelled, which does happen. Our registry runs 43 RPM (Omega VSJ843) to 110 RPM (Tribest twin gear) for genuine cold press.
- 2.The shape in the photo. A tall machine with a chute on top is a vertical. A long machine you push produce into from the side is a horizontal. Two visible gears rather than a screw means twin gear.
- 3.A chute measurement. This tells you how much chopping you are in for, and it is published far more often than yield. 45 mm (Hurom H400) means real prep; 3.5 in (Kuvings REVO830) means whole fruit.
- 4.Whether a strainer is mentioned at all. "Mesh-free" or "no strainer" is a structural cleanup claim you can verify in the product photo. Silence means there is a conventional mesh screen.
If a listing gives you none of those four, that is itself informative -- and the manufacturer's own product page almost always does. Every product on this site links to it in the sources.
Questions people ask
What is the difference between cold press and masticating juicers?
Is a slow juicer the same as a cold press juicer?
Why do brands use both terms on the same product?
What is the real mechanical division within cold press juicers?
What should I compare when buying a cold press juicer?
A listing says cold press but gives no RPM. Is it really a slow juicer?
Sources
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. Where a source does not publish a number, the page says “Not available” rather than estimating one.
- Omega NC900HDC specifications — Marketed as cold press, mechanically a masticating horizontal auger
- Hurom H400 Easy Clean — Marketed as a slow juicer, 90 RPM, strainer-free, 45 mm chute
- Tribest Greenstar Elite — 110 RPM twin gear - the genuine mechanical alternative to a single auger
Read next
Juicer Comparisons
Type-against-type and model-against-model comparisons, all decided on the same four criteria.
How Cold Press Juicers Work
The mechanism explained: auger, screen, back-pressure, and why three different names mean one machine.
Twin Gear vs Masticating Juicer
Two gears versus one auger: more thorough extraction, considerably more work.
The Best Masticating Juicers
Five masticating machines across vertical and horizontal, ranked on the four criteria.
Cold Press and Masticating Juicers
The slow-auger category: vertical, horizontal and twin gear, judged on yield, pulp, cleanup time and price.