Cold Press vs Centrifugal Juicer
Cold press and masticating are the same machine. Here is what it does differently, and when it is not worth it.
By Brijon M. · Last reviewed October 2, 2026
We earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It does not change what we recommend or the order we rank things in. Full disclosure.
Cold press wins on fibrous produce, foam, noise and storage. Centrifugal wins on speed, prep time and price. If you will juice celery or greens, buy cold press; if your list is apples and carrots, the cheaper machine is genuinely the better purchase. First, though, one piece of language needs clearing up.
Cold press is a marketing term
Nothing in a home juicer is pressed cold in the industrial sense. There is no refrigeration and no hydraulic press. What there is, is a slowly turning auger -- and because slow crushing generates less friction heat and whips in less air than a basket spinning at thousands of RPM, the phrase "cold press" stuck.
Masticating is the mechanical term for the same machine. Slow juicer is the plain-English one. A product listing that uses all three is describing one mechanism three times. How cold press juicers work goes through the mechanics.
What the slower speed actually buys
| Effect | Is it real? | Does it matter? |
|---|---|---|
| Less foam | Yes, clearly. Breville ships a froth separator on the JE98XL for the centrifugal version of this problem | Cosmetic for immediate drinking; matters if you batch |
| Slower color and taste change | Yes. Less aeration means less oxygen contact. Omega claims 72-hour storage for its 80 RPM machines | Matters a lot if you make several days at once |
| Less heat | Yes, measurably less friction at 50 RPM than 12,000 | We do not make nutritional claims about it, in either direction |
| Better extraction from fiber | Mechanically yes - crushing along a strand rather than cutting across it | The single biggest practical difference |
| Quieter | Yes, and substantially | Decisive if you live in an apartment or juice early |
| Criterion | Hurom H400 Easy Clean | Omega J8006HDS | Breville Juice Fountain Plus JE98XL | Breville Juice Fountain Cold XL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yield | Hurom claims the highest yield and least pulp of any Easy Clean model; no numeric figure, and no independent verification we could findManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02 | Omega markets high juice yield; no numeric figure is publishedManufacturer claim: Omega Juicers · checked 2026-10-02 | Not availableNot sourced | Not availableNot sourced |
| Pulp | Hurom claims the least pulp of any Easy Clean model; no comparable figure publishedManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02 | Not availableNot sourced | Breville states the carafe includes a froth separatorManufacturer claim: Breville · checked 2026-10-02 | Not availableNot sourced |
| Cleanup time | Hurom markets it as Scrub-Free Cleaning; no cleanup time in minutes is publishedManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02 | Not available - no published cleanup time in minutesNot sourced | Not available - no published cleanup time in minutesNot sourced | Not available - no published cleanup time in minutesNot sourced |
| Price | $400+Band from retailer listings, checked 2026-10-02 | $200–400Band from retailer listings, checked 2026-10-02 | $100–200Band from retailer listings, checked 2026-10-02 | $200–400Band from retailer listings, checked 2026-10-02 |
| Noise | Not available | Not available | Not available | Breville claims noise-reduction technology cuts mechanical noise by 40 percent; no decibel figure publishedManufacturer claim: Breville · checked 2026-10-02 |
| Speed | Hurom states 90 RPM, 150 WManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02 | Omega states 80 RPM, 200 W, triple-stage augerManufacturer claim: Omega Juicers · checked 2026-10-02 | Breville states dual speed: 6,500 RPM low and 12,000 RPM high, 850 WManufacturer claim: Breville · checked 2026-10-02 | Breville states 1200 W, multi-speedManufacturer claim: Breville · checked 2026-10-02 |
| Warranty | Hurom states a 15-year warranty on motor and partsManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02 | Omega states a 15-year limited warrantyManufacturer claim: Omega Juicers · checked 2026-10-02 | Breville states a 1-year limited warrantyManufacturer claim: Breville · checked 2026-10-02 | Breville states a 1-year limited warrantyManufacturer claim: Breville · checked 2026-10-02 |
What centrifugal buys instead
Time, and quite a lot of it. Breville states a 3 in feed tube on the JE98XL and 3.5 in on the Cold XL; Hamilton Beach states 3 in on a machine under $100. A 3 in chute takes a whole apple, which means no board, no knife and nothing extra in the sink. Then the juice arrives in a couple of minutes rather than twelve.
Money. The capable budget machines are all here. And some of the warranties are better than the premium shelf: Hamilton Beach states 3 years on a sub-$100 machine while Breville states 1 year on a $400 one.
Choose by produce, not by marketing
- Celery, kale, chard, spinach, wheatgrass, herbs -> cold press. Not a preference. The mechanism.
- Apples, carrots, beets, cucumber, peeled citrus -> either, and centrifugal is faster and cheaper.
- Soft produce: tomatoes, watermelon -> cold press, gently. High speed just aerates what is already liquid.
- Whole citrus -> neither. A citrus tool does it better than both.

Where we stand
We neither manufacture nor sell juicers, which is relevant here because most of the pages ranking for this comparison are published by brands whose catalogs are slow juicers. We earn an affiliate commission on purchases through our links, disclosed on every page, and it does not change the ordering -- which is why this page recommends a sub-$100 centrifugal machine for an apple-and-carrot buyer.
Which one lasts longer
The warranties are the only honest guide, and they point one way. Omega, Hurom and Kuvings all state 15 years on their premium cold press machines; Omega states the same on the mid-range J8006HDS, and Tribest states 10 to 12. Across centrifugal machines the range is 1 to 3 years: Breville states 1 on both the JE98XL and the $400 Cold XL, Mueller and BLACK+DECKER state 2, and Hamilton Beach states 3.
That is not a small gap, and a warranty is the one number on a product page that is a commitment rather than a claim. It is also worth reading the split: Nama covers its motor for 15 years and parts for only 2, where Hurom covers both for 15. Parts are what wear -- augers crack, screens deform, drums scratch -- so a motor-only figure is worth less than it looks.
The one surprise in the data is that price does not predict warranty inside the centrifugal category. Hamilton Beach's 3 years on a sub-$100 machine is three times what Breville commits to on a machine costing four times more.
Questions people ask
Is cold press the same as masticating?
Is cold press juice better than centrifugal juice?
Is a cold press juicer worth the extra money?
Does cold press juice last longer?
Which is faster in practice?
Which type of juicer lasts longer?
How much counter space does each type need?
Sources
Every figure on this page traces to one of these. Where a source does not publish a number, the page says “Not available” rather than estimating one.
- Omega J8006 specifications — 80 RPM, 15-year warranty, 72-hour storage claim
- Breville Juice Fountain Plus JE98XL — 850 W, dual speed, 3 in feed tube, froth separator
- Hamilton Beach Big Mouth 67601A — 3 in chute, 800 W, 3-year limited warranty
Read next
Juicer Comparisons
Type-against-type and model-against-model comparisons, all decided on the same four criteria.
Masticating vs Centrifugal Juicer
The decision that constrains every other juicer choice, settled on the four criteria.
How Cold Press Juicers Work
The mechanism explained: auger, screen, back-pressure, and why three different names mean one machine.
Centrifugal Juicers
Fast juicers with wide chutes and low prices: what the spinning-basket mechanism does well, and where it fails.
The Best Juicers Under $200
Four machines under $200 - the band where cold press becomes affordable, including the easiest-cleaning option.