Skip to content
Auger & Pulp

Do Juicers Remove Fiber?

Most of it, and you can see exactly where it went. The pulp container is the fiber. What stays in the glass is the part you cannot see.

By Brijon M. · Last reviewed October 17, 2026

Yes -- a juicer removes most of the fiber, and the pulp container is where it went. That is the honest mechanical answer, and the useful detail sits one layer down: what a juicer removes is the insoluble fiber, the structural material that holds a plant up. Some soluble fiber, which dissolves into the liquid, comes through into the glass, along with whatever fine particles the screen lets past. That is why fresh juice is cloudy rather than clear.

Where the fiber actually goes

Both mechanisms separate a plant into two streams, and both put the bulk of the structural fiber into the same place:

  • In an auger machine, the screw drags produce into a narrowing chamber and crushes it against a mesh screen. Liquid goes through the mesh; the crushed fibrous mat keeps travelling and is pushed out of a separate opening as pulp. The screen mesh is what decides how much fine material follows the liquid.
  • In a centrifugal machine, a flat blade shreds produce against the base of a spinning basket and centrifugal force throws the liquid out through the basket wall. The shredded fiber stays in the basket or is ejected into a bin. Because the shredding is violent, more of the fiber is reduced to particles small enough to pass the mesh -- which is why centrifugal juice is cloudier.

So the fiber is not destroyed and it is not transformed. It is sorted, and you can hold the sorted result in your hand. Juicer pulp explained goes into what the pulp actually is, and what to do with juicer pulp covers using it rather than binning it.

Soluble and insoluble, briefly and mechanically

Insoluble fiberSoluble fiber
What it isStructural plant material - cellulose, the stringy part of celery, apple skinMaterial that dissolves or disperses into water
Where it ends upThe pulp container, almost entirelyPartly in the juice, partly held in the pulp
Can you see it?Yes - the pulp bin is full of itNo - it is in solution in the glass
Does machine choice change it?Only at the margins, via screen meshBarely
A mechanical description of how a juicer sorts plant material, not a nutritional claim. No manufacturer in this category publishes a fiber-content measurement for juice from any machine.

The one honest caveat: nobody publishes a number here. No juicer manufacturer measures the fiber content of the juice its machines produce, and no published test compares machines on it. So "most of the insoluble fiber" is as precise as the available evidence allows, and anyone quoting a percentage for a specific juicer generated it.

A blender removes none of it

This is the comparison the question is usually really about. A blender has no screen and no separation stage -- it breaks the entire plant down and keeps all of it in the jug. Nothing is removed, which is why a smoothie is thick and a juice is not. A juicer's defining feature is the separation; a blender's defining feature is the absence of it.

That is a mechanical difference with no "better" attached to it from us, and it is the main reason this site tells some people to buy a blender instead of a juicer. Juicer vs blender and juice vs smoothie are the two pages that work through which appliance suits which plan, and juicer vs vitamix covers the specific machine people usually mean.

Juice pulp in a collection container beside a juicer
The pulp container. This is the fiber, and it is the only answer this question has.

What to look for if you want more fiber in the glass

If the point of the question is to keep more fiber, the specification to look for is pulp control -- a coarser screen, a second filter, or an adjustable pressure setting. Four machines on this site publish one:

  1. 1.Omega NC900HDC -- Omega states five adjustable end-cap pressure settings and two juicing screens at 80 RPM on 150 W. Coarse screen plus low pressure is the most fiber this site can point to from a published setting, and it is the most flexible machine here.
  2. 2.Ninja NeverClog JC151 -- Ninja states two pulp filters, for less pulp or more pulp, plus 150 W and dishwasher-safe removable parts. The cheapest explicit more-pulp option.
  3. 3.Cuisinart Pulp Control Citrus Juicer -- Cuisinart states three pulp control settings: low, medium and high, with a limited 3-year warranty. For orange and grapefruit juice specifically.
  4. 4.Breville Citrus Press Pro 800CPXL -- Breville states adjustable pulp control on a powered lever press, at 110 W with four dishwasher-safe parts.

Three machines that let you choose

CriterionOmega NC900HDCNinja NeverClog JC151Cuisinart Pulp Control Citrus Juicer
YieldOmega markets high juice yield and five pressure settings; no numeric yield figure is publishedManufacturer claim: Omega Juicers · checked 2026-10-02Not availableNot sourcedNot availableNot sourced
PulpFive adjustable pressure settings and two juicing screens, per OmegaManufacturer claim: Omega Juicers · checked 2026-10-02Ninja states two pulp filters, for less pulp or more pulpManufacturer claim: Ninja · checked 2026-10-02Cuisinart states three pulp control settings: low, medium and highManufacturer claim: Cuisinart · checked 2026-10-02
Cleanup timeNot available - no published cleanup time in minutesNot sourcedNinja states the removable parts are dishwasher safe; no cleanup time publishedManufacturer claim: Ninja · checked 2026-10-02Not available - no published cleanup time in minutesNot sourced
Price$200–400Band from retailer listings, checked 2026-10-02$100–200Band from retailer listings, checked 2026-10-02Under $100Band from retailer listings, checked 2026-10-02
SpeedOmega states 80 RPM and 150 W outputManufacturer claim: Omega Juicers · checked 2026-10-02Ninja states 150 W; no RPM publishedManufacturer claim: Ninja · checked 2026-10-02Not available - Cuisinart publishes no wattage or RPM for this modelNot sourced
WarrantyOmega states a 15-year limited warrantyManufacturer claim: Omega Juicers · checked 2026-10-02Ninja states a 1-year limited warranty in the US (2 years in some regions)Manufacturer claim: Ninja · checked 2026-10-02Cuisinart states a limited 3-year warrantyManufacturer claim: Cuisinart · checked 2026-10-02
The three machines on this site with the most explicit published pulp control, on the four criteria we judge on. Scroll the table sideways on a narrow screen. Every figure above is labeled with where it came from; “Not available” means we could not find a published source, not that the machine performs badly. How we pick.

The Omega NC900HDC is the one to buy if you want the decision to stay open -- five pressure settings and two screens, with a 15-year limited warranty. The Ninja NeverClog JC151 does the same job with a filter swap under $200. The Cuisinart Pulp Control Citrus Juicer settles the orange juice argument for the lowest price on this list. The fuller versions are juicers that keep the pulp and, for the opposite preference, best pulp-free juicers.

Two things that cost nothing

To put fiber back: stir a spoonful of the pulp straight back into the glass. It works on any machine, it costs nothing, and it is more effective than any screen setting. The texture is grainy and some people dislike it, which is the only real objection.

To take more out: pour the juice through a fine-mesh sieve or a nut-milk bag. That removes more fine pulp than any setting on any machine on this page, and it is how juice bars get glass-clear juice from ordinary equipment.

Both are worth knowing before you shop, because the honest position is that a sieve and a spoon cover most of what a pulp-control feature does. Buy for pulp control if you are buying a machine anyway; do not replace a working juicer over it.

If you are still deciding whether a juicer is the right appliance at all, is a juicer worth it is the page that takes that seriously, and juicing for beginners covers starting out.

The appliance decision that follows from this one is covered in juicers and blenders -- whether to own both, and what a combination machine actually does to the juicing stage.

Questions people ask

Do juicers remove fiber?
Most of it. A juicer separates a plant into liquid and a fibrous mat, and the mat -- which is almost all of the insoluble fiber -- ends up in the pulp container. Some soluble fiber dissolves into the liquid and comes through into the glass, along with whatever fine particles the screen lets past, which is why fresh juice is cloudy rather than clear.
Do masticating juicers remove fiber too?
Yes. Every juicer with a screen separates fiber from liquid, and augers are no exception -- the screw crushes produce against a mesh and pushes the dry fibrous mat out of a separate opening. If anything an auger's coarser pulp means slightly less fine fiber reaches the glass than from a centrifugal machine, which shreds fiber into particles small enough to pass the mesh.
Does any juice keep the fiber?
Not if it comes from a juicer, because separation is what a juicer does. If keeping all the fiber is the goal, the appliance is a blender -- it has no screen and no separation stage, so nothing is removed. That is the mechanical difference between a juice and a smoothie, and it is the reason this site sometimes tells people to buy a blender instead.
How do you add fiber back into fresh juice?
Stir a spoonful of the pulp from the bin back into the glass. It costs nothing, works on any machine, and puts back more fiber than any pulp-control setting will. The only objection is texture -- it makes the juice grainy, which some people dislike. A coarse screen or a more-pulp filter is the tidier version of the same idea.
Which juicer leaves the most fiber in the juice?
The ones with published pulp control. Omega states five adjustable pressure settings and two juicing screens on the NC900HDC, which run on a coarse screen at low pressure gives the heaviest glass available from a published setting. Ninja states two pulp filters on the JC151, one of which is explicitly the more-pulp option. No brand publishes a fiber-content measurement, so these are hardware descriptions rather than figures.
Is it bad that juicing removes fiber?
That is a nutrition question and outside what this site covers. Auger & Pulp writes about juicing machines -- yield, pulp, cleanup and price -- and has no standing to make health claims in either direction. What we can tell you is mechanical: the fiber is in the pulp container, you can see it, and you can stir some of it back if you want to. For the health side, ask a dietitian.

Sources

Every figure on this page traces to one of these. Where a source does not publish a number, the page says “Not available” rather than estimating one.

  • Juicer vs Blender

    Two different drinks, not two grades of one. The cheapest question to resolve before buying.

  • Juicer Pulp, Explained

    The difference between pulp in your juice and pulp dryness in the bin, and which machines control each.

  • Juicers That Keep the Pulp

    The honest answer on pulp: no juicer keeps all of it, three machines let you choose how much, and sometimes a blender is what you actually want.

  • Juice vs Smoothie

    The honest difference between a juice and a smoothie, what each is good at, and which machine each one actually requires.