Skip to content
Auger & Pulp

Nama J2 vs Hurom H400

Two premium verticals solving two different frustrations. Which one depends on which part you hate.

By Brijon M. · Last reviewed October 2, 2026

We earn a commission if you buy through links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It does not change what we recommend or the order we rank things in. Full disclosure.

Buy the Nama J2 if standing at the machine feeding it is what you hate. Buy the Hurom H400 if washing the mesh screen is what you hate. Both are premium verticals at similar money, and each attacks a different half of the same problem -- the friction that makes people stop juicing.

CriterionNama J2Hurom H400 Easy Clean
YieldNama states 20-30 oz of juice per batch, depending on ingredientsManufacturer claim: Nama · checked 2026-10-02Hurom claims the highest yield and least pulp of any Easy Clean model; no numeric figure, and no independent verification we could findManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02
PulpNot availableNot sourcedHurom claims the least pulp of any Easy Clean model; no comparable figure publishedManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02
Cleanup timeNot available - no published cleanup time in minutesNot sourcedHurom markets it as Scrub-Free Cleaning; no cleanup time in minutes is publishedManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02
Price$400+Band from retailer listings, checked 2026-10-02$400+Band from retailer listings, checked 2026-10-02
NoiseNot availableNot sourcedNot available
SpeedNama states 50 RPM, single-phase induction motor, 200 WManufacturer claim: Nama · checked 2026-10-02Hurom states 90 RPM, 150 WManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02
WarrantyNama states 15 years on the motor, 2 years on partsManufacturer claim: Nama · checked 2026-10-02Hurom states a 15-year warranty on motor and partsManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02
Scroll the table sideways on a narrow screen. Every figure above is labeled with where it came from; “Not available” means we could not find a published source, not that the machine performs badly. How we pick.

What each one actually does differently

Nama J2: the hopper

Nama states 50 RPM from a single-phase induction motor at 200 W, with a hands-free hopper you load once and leave. Nama also publishes 20-30 oz of juice per batch depending on ingredients, which is one of very few yield-adjacent figures anybody in this category states at all.

The warranty is split: Nama states 15 years on the motor and 2 years on parts. That parts figure is worth noticing, because the parts are what actually wear.

Hurom H400: no strainer

Hurom states 90 RPM and 150 W with its Easy Clean design, which has no mesh strainer at all -- Hurom markets this as Scrub-Free Cleaning. The chute is 45 mm, the machine weighs 14.8 lb, and the warranty is 15 years on motor and parts, not motor only.

Hurom also claims the H400 delivers the highest yield and least pulp of any Easy Clean model. Read that carefully: it is a claim about Hurom's own range, not about the category, there is no number attached, and we found no independent test verifying it.

The differences that decide it

Nama J2Hurom H400
Speed50 RPM90 RPM
Power200 W induction150 W
FeedingHands-free hopperManual, 45 mm chute
StrainerConventionalNone - Easy Clean design
Warranty15 years motor, 2 years parts15 years motor and parts
Weight12.1 lb14.8 lb
Published yield figure20-30 oz per batchNone - a within-range claim only
All figures are the manufacturers' own, linked in the sources below.

Two things stand out. The parts warranty: Hurom covers parts for 15 years where Nama covers them for 2, and on a machine you will use daily for a decade that is a real difference. And the speed: 50 RPM against 90 RPM, where the Nama is the slower and therefore gentler machine.

Choose the Nama J2 if

  • You juice daily and resent standing over the machine. The hopper is genuinely transformative for that specific complaint.
  • You batch. Load it, start it, do something else.
  • You want the slower crush. 50 RPM against 90 RPM.
  • You want a published batch figure. Nama is one of the only brands that states any volume number at all.

Choose the Hurom H400 if

  • Cleanup is what ended your last juicing habit. No mesh strainer is the strongest structural answer to that on the market.
  • You want the longer parts cover. 15 years on parts rather than 2.
  • You want to store it away. 14.8 lb is heavier than the Nama but still liftable, and the simpler parts set reassembles quickly.
  • You do not mind chopping. The 45 mm chute means prep regardless.
Clean kitchen parts drying beside a sink
Two premium machines, two different frustrations removed. Pick the one that matches yours.

Our verdict

For most buyers at this price, the Hurom, on the strength of the parts warranty and the strainer-free design -- cleanup is statistically the thing that ends juicing habits, and 15 years on parts is a stronger commitment than 2. The Nama is the better machine if you specifically want to stop feeding a juicer by hand, and that is a real and common complaint.

If neither fits, the best vertical slow juicers covers the wider field, and Kuvings REVO830 vs Nama J2 brings the third premium contender in.

Our pick, with a buy link

1. Our verdict: the Hurom H400

Hurom H400 Easy Clean

Hurom H400 · $400+ · Our score 8.0/10

On the strength of the parts warranty and the strainer-free design. Hurom states 15 years on motor AND parts, where Nama covers parts for 2 -- and parts are what wear. Cleanup is statistically the thing that ends juicing habits, and removing the mesh strainer is the most direct answer anyone has given to it. The Nama is the better machine if your specific complaint is the feeding rather than the washing.

Yield
Hurom claims the highest yield and least pulp of any Easy Clean model; no numeric figure, and no independent verification we could findManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02
Pulp
Hurom claims the least pulp of any Easy Clean model; no comparable figure publishedManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02
Cleanup time
Hurom markets it as Scrub-Free Cleaning; no cleanup time in minutes is publishedManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02
Speed
Hurom states 90 RPM, 150 WManufacturer claim: Hurom · checked 2026-10-02

What works

  • No mesh strainer to scrub - the design removes the part people complain about most
  • 15 years on motor AND parts, which is rare
  • Lighter than most verticals at 14.8 lb, so storing it away is realistic

What does not

  • 1.8 in chute means real prep chopping
  • The yield and pulp claims are Hurom's own and unverified by any test we could find
  • 90 RPM is the fast end of slow juicing

Skip this if: You juice a lot of wheatgrass or very fibrous greens - the wide-gap Easy Clean design trades some fine-strainer extraction for speed at the sink.

A slow juicer and a glass of juice on a pale counter

Representative photo. We have no manufacturer image library, so this is a licensed stock photo of the category, not a photo of this unit.

  • Yield8/10
  • Pulp8/10
  • Cleanup9/10
  • Value6/10
  • Quiet8/10

Read the full Hurom H400 Easy Clean review

Questions people ask

Is the Nama J2 or the Hurom H400 better?
They solve different problems. The Nama removes the feeding with a hands-free hopper; the Hurom removes the mesh strainer so there is far less to wash. The Hurom also carries 15 years on parts against the Nama's 2.
Which is quieter, the Nama J2 or the Hurom H400?
Neither publishes a decibel figure. The Nama runs at 50 RPM and the Hurom at 90 RPM, and lower speed generally means less noise, so the Nama is likely quieter -- but that is a mechanical inference, not a measurement.
Which has the better warranty?
The Hurom, clearly. Hurom states 15 years on motor and parts; Nama states 15 years on the motor but only 2 on parts, and parts are what wear.
Does the Nama J2 produce more juice?
Unknown. Nama publishes 20-30 oz per batch, which is a capacity statement rather than an extraction rate, and Hurom publishes no figure at all. Neither claim allows a comparison.
Do both need produce chopped first?
The Hurom does -- 45 mm chute. The Nama's hopper takes more at once, though you still prepare produce to fit. Neither takes whole apples the way Kuvings' 3.5 in chute does.

Sources

Every figure on this page traces to one of these. Where a source does not publish a number, the page says “Not available” rather than estimating one.